RSS Feed

218-1 is a bad bill. Faleshood not needed here.

Tuesday, March 10, 2020



By now we expect 218-1 The Residential Tenancies Amendment Bill to be fairly bedded in. You’ve got to be living under a rock to not know about it. Information about the Bill is readily available. No major surprises there.

Commentaries as to its effects is another story altogether. Some are logical, matter of fact and should go without saying (e.g. you can’t advertise a rental without a price, you just can’t). Some are speculative at best which is fine for now seeing the Bill is awkwardly worded. The rest are such gross extrapolations and mis-facts that not only do they sow fear, but they also work against our collective efforts to mount a legitimate challenge to 218-1 with cogent arguments. 

To date, we have seen an increasing number of these mis-facts from both sides of the debate. To be clear, we are vehmently against 218-1. There are plenty of strong and clear reasons to reject the Bill that it is not necessary for landlords to resort to and propagate mis-facts. 

Today, we examine one such hasty extrapolation: that the RTA Amendment Bill paves the way for lifetime tenancies. That is false. Now, you may want to stop here but if you have an interest in policy interpretation then, by all means, stay on to geek out with us. 


We are concerned with the suggestion that: taking away the 90-day notice to terminate + broadening the tenant's control over the manner in which fixed-term tenancies (FT) are rolled into periodic tenancies = lifetime tenancy/tenant for life. 

So, is this true? Will you be stuck with a tenant for life? No.


On termination

For the time being, a landlord can issue a 90-day notice to terminate without stating a reason. It is a unilateral notice that is not open to challenge unless the tenant believes that it is issued in retaliation of the tenant exercising a legal right.

218-1 seeks to remove that unilateral notice by requiring landlords to provide a reason for termination (notice periods differ depending on the reason). In general, even though the stated reason fits within the Bill, it would still be open to being challenged by the tenant.

On fixed-term (over 90-days) tenancies rolling into a periodic tenancy on expiry

Currently, a fixed-term tenancy rolls into a periodic on expiry unless both parties agree to extend/enter into a new FT or if one party gives the other unilateral notice not to continue beyond the current FT. The Tribunal can rule for early termination and reasonable compensation by one party to the other could flow on from this order. Pretty straightforward and the power of control fairly evenly distributed between the landlord and the tenant.

The Bill seeks to shift that balance in favour of the tenant by requiring an FT to roll into a periodic unless

  • both parties agree before expiry to renew/extend or to discontinue altogether;
  • the tenant gives unilateral notice to discontinue after expiry (28-day timing requirement to be met);
  • either during the FT or on expiry, one party gives notice to terminate for the following reasons:
    • a mortgagee or another person in the same vein has become entitled to the property (could be a ‘landlord’ notice or a tenant notice)
    • the property is destroyed and has become uninhabitable (could be a tenant notice or a landlord notice)
    • death of tenant (tenant notice)
    • the property is destroyed/damaged as to be uninhabitable due to a breach (the party not in breach could issue notice)
    • any reasons for termination provided for in the tenancy agreement (could be a tenant notice or a landlord notice)
    • any approved reasons provided for by the act with the correct notice (could be a tenant notice or a landlord notice)

In essence, the manner in which FTs are rolled into a periodic tenancy is now more in the hands of the tenant rather than the landlord.

But that doesn't mean lifetime tenancy is highly likely or a credible threat. In the case of an FT, even with the landlord not being able to issue a unilateral notice to terminate nor a 90-day no-fault termination notice, the tenancy still continues so long as both the landlord and tenant continue to perform their respective obligations under the agreement specifically and the RTA generally. For example, rent will still have to be paid, repair and maintenance would still have to be carried out. In addition, continuation is only viable if each party accepts the other’s exercising of his/her rights. For instance, if the landlord legally increases rent the tenant would give notice to terminate if he/she is not prepared to pay the new rent. If the tenant doesn’t give notice but is unable to pay, other mechanisms under the RTA would kick in providing a pathway to termination (this is by no means to suggest that these are straightforward for landlords. 218-1 does make termination cumbersome).

Sure, if the landlord is to have the greatest misfortune of being in an FT with a tenant who is so cunning, so able and acting with such bad faith as to explore every single one of the system loophole to evade termination without having to perform his requisite obligations then yes, in that very rare instance we could see a pathway to lifetime tenancy that is fully in the control of the tenant. For that the happen the tenant's means, motive and opportunity would have to be lined up so exactly against the interests of the landlords that we simply think it would be an exception rather than the norm.

So if not lifetime tenancy, what should landlords worry about?

Loss of control. That is what landlords should worry about. 

You see, it is common for landlords to enter into an FT that accommodate and address certain lifestyle goals and business challenges. For example, December is a tough month for vacant rentals. It is also a time when people go on holidays (and landlords wouldn't have the time or resource to properly source a tenant). But the business challenges (i.e. deriving an income from the property) remains throughout the month. It is not unreasonable for landlords working within these parameters to make sure that their FTs do not finish during December. This and similar such strategies are only feasible if landlords retain the ability to issue a unilateral notice to discontinue at expiry. Let's not forget, the tenant also has exact same right. 

Our view is that FTs are contractual relationships the termination of which should be equally in the hands of both parties. What this government seeks to do is to put its thumb on the scale in favour of the tenants by taking the reciprocal right away from landlords. By doing so, it contravenes the principles of justice and fairness that we've come to expect from our representatives.  

Furthermore, we can foresee landlords mitigating that loss of control by either no longer granting FTs (making tenant's ability to remain in their homes more uncertain) or removing their rental stocks from the market (reducing supply which will result in pricing pressure on tenants and possible overcrowding at rental properties). If we are serious about lifting up NZ rental laws to modern standards, we've got to balance the rights of a property occupier against those of a property owner. To demonise and unjustifiably disadvantage one in order to serve the interest of the other would only give rise a reactionary change in norms (e.g. withdrawal of FTs from the market) that would ultimately distort the market and lead to unintended consequences.

Why is this a worthy discussion?

Because the subtext of 'lifetime tenancy' as it is being floated around is that it is terrible and to the absolute detriment of landlords.

Let’s take a step back and think about this logically. A landlord (contrast from a speculator) and a tenant are both interested in long-term tenancies, under acceptable terms, of course. One is after a sustained income and the other wants a stable home. So if conditions are met and no one is breaching the tenancy agreement nor the RTA it follows then that lifetime tenancy serves both parties. All the while, the landlord continues to be able to terminate for reasons such as the property being put on the market or has been sold so really, there is no such thing as a lifetime tenancy. When the noisemakers rally the crowd against lifetime tenancy, they are not actually talking about lifetime tenancy. They are talking about the lack of equal control for landlords and that is something all landlords should rile against.

Our point is this: Taking away the 90-day notice to terminate is bad. Giving tenant more control than landlords over FTs is bad. The bill is substantially bad enough to be rejected. We need honest brokers in this debate, not scaremongerers who will only diminish the integrity of our position.

 Have you made your submission against 218-1 yet? Deadline is 25th of March 2020. This is the final opportunity for landlords to speak up!


Recent Posts


rental market extractor fan trust partners property cycle winz early termination beginner investor scotney williams lvr barfoot and thompson ring-fencing housing affordability Tribunal case study commerce commission advice investor parry v inglis reserve bank legal cost wealth creation khh gluckman report Investor story warren buffett speculator positive cash flow apia Question and answer minor dwelling interest only mortgage clnz heating Must knows letting fee anti-social behaviour DTI twg report Jeff Bezos auckland council tenancy tribunal debt enforcement damage interest rates Must know RTAA 2019 bond form equity initio HHGA bad tenant television income asbestos business HHS brightline mindset covid-19 tenancy services tax market rent subdivision financial advisers act Level 4 housing bubble worksafe TCIT election 2017 letting education Gluckman Property (Relationships) Act termination RBNZ privacy anz inspection management landlord buying maintenance buying rules rent capital gain CoreLogic recycling equity bankruptcy bond sale and purchas airbnb renovation nzpif investment strategy opes partners rtaa2020 Case study quiet enjoyment Standards New Zealand tenancy issues ird Investment tip rent arrears principal and interest HSWA buyer's agent smoke alarm cgt data security auckland insurance building finance rental wof banking meth contamination retaliatory notice return ask an expert property maintenance Guest blog cat first home buying property management election2020 Sponsored post heater skill shortage development ocr water bill sublease warm up new zealand kiwibuild boarding house market rent increase house prices property value meth Editor's Choice tenant LIM holiday house CCC watercare off the plan negotiation government ventilation How to shower dome wins property relationship Market report Q&A property apprentice productivity rta reform short-term rental sale and purchase Holler will insulation shortland chartered accountants structure re agent rta fixed-term tenancy Landlording trespass yield unitary plan cash-flow robert kiyosaki Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance trademe personal growth p lab legal


Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo
09 360 2376

The Tenancy Practice Service and TPS Credit Control work closely with the Auckland Property Investors' Association. Our vision of bringing helpful resources, documents and high quality services to Auckland Property Investors and Property Managers is shared by APIA, so its a partnership that works well. 

The Auckland Property Investors' Association is a great organisation for those who want access to advice and information from a range of industry experts and partners. 

Mathieu Holt- Managing Director, The Tenancy Practice Service & TPS Credit Control
Through the Association I found the channels and methods to fund the purchase of property I never dreamed about. Grant Brown

All round it has been one of those things Neil and I felt was really worthwhile belonging to. We have learned so much it has just built our confidence in what we are doing.

Janice Bieleski
I read two articles in the monthly magazine that saved me over $5,000. That is my membership fee for the next 26 years and I am sure I will learn a whole lot more! John Duncan
Fantastic organisation. The networking opportunities are brilliant and provide us with information and opportunities that cannot be obtained anywhere else. We learn something new at every meeting and we've been in this game for nearly 20 years. Pauline and Gyanen Kumar

I find the information obtained from various APIA meetings very useful in guiding my own property investment and rental management.  I also enjoy the networking opportunities with like-minded investors.  I am inspired by other investors’ success and find the more experiences and knowledge that I share with others, the more confident I become.  

Thanks to all APIA event organizers and administrators for your brilliant work. 

Stella Shao

I like talking to people and learning from their experience because it gives me the confidence to invest well. I think it is a knowledge thing. I now know I am doing things the right way.

Stephen Weatherall

My APIA membership has become a total success.

Every time I attend a monthly or regional meeting I come away with so many useful and positive tips that have added value to my property investments and management.

Not only that, the website is a great place for practical advice and useful information. It has now evolved into an important resource for my business.

Talk about value for money! The discounts I have been getting at Bunnings when I present my APIA membership card have more than paid for my annual subscription!

Tim Duffett, Plan A Investments Limited