APIA Blog

RSS Feed

Termination invalidated by a mere diary entry

Tuesday, November 17, 2020

 

Re: Atkinson v Monarch Realty Ltd [2020] NZTT Hamilton 4279083

 
Facts
  • 5th July 2020 - Leak discovered at the property due to lack of maintenance
  • 11th August to 9th September 2020 - Remedial work carried out
  • 1st September 2020 - Citing a lack of confidence that the tenant would property ventilate (and therefore look after) the property, the property manager recommended the landlord to consider terminating the tenancy before the RTAA 2020 becomes law in February 2021.
  • Early September 2020 - Two subsequent discussions between the property manager and landlord about termination resulting in the property manager diarising "Issue 90-day notice to 24 Morrow Ave ??: Ring owner first" for 22nd September 2020.
  • 15th September 2020 - The property manager discussed the possibility of a rent increase with the tenant over the phone. The conversation turned to the tenant's dissatisfaction of the tenancy due to a "lack of preventative maintenance".
  • 22nd September 2020 - The tenant received a 90-day notice to terminate.
  • 20th October 2020 - The tenant filed a Tribunal application seeking to have the termination notice declared retaliatory and reversed.
 
The law

S54 of the Residential Tenancies Act (the Act) deals with retaliatory notices. The Tribunal can set aside a termination notice if it is satisfied that '... in giving the notice, the landlord was motivated wholly or partly by' the tenant exercising or appearing to exercise his/her right vis-à-vis the tenancy. The onus is on the tenant to bring and establish such a claim to the Tribunal.

To achieve an s54 order, the tenant must:

  1. Make an application to have the order declared retaliatory and therefore no effect within 28 days of receiving that order;
  2. Prove on the balance of probabilities that in issuing the termination notice the landlord was at least in part motivated by the tenant asserting his/her right in relation to the tenancy.
 
Outcome

The Tribunal found for the tenant. Adjudicator G Barnett reasoned the decision thus:

  • In the absence of further documentation that would signify an explicit instruction from the landlord to terminate the tenancy, the Tribunal can only rely on the property manager's calendar entry of 22nd September.
  • The entry that reads "Issue 90-day notice to 24 Morrow Ave ??: Ring owner first." falls short at establishing an explicit instruction from the landlord to terminate. Even if it predated 15th September, the line '...??: Ring owner first", points to a flirtation with the idea to terminate rather than a decision to terminate in fact.
  • The 15th September phone call amounts to a complaint by the tenant seeking to assert his right to have the landlord maintain the property to a reasonable standard.
  • As the termination notice followed the call, it is plausible that the landlord was motivated at least in part by the tenant's complaint.

The adjudicator declares the termination notice to be of no effect and ordered the landlord to pay for the tenant's filing fee. No exemplary damages were awarded in this instance.

 
Take-home for landlords
  • If you are instructing your property manager to terminate a tenancy, you should do so explicitly and in writing.
  • If you are diarising a future date to issue a termination notice yourself, then do so in unequivocal terms.
  • The Act sets out only minimum notice periods for termination. You are free to give longer notices, especially if that gives you the ability to 'lock-in' any prior interaction with your tenant to minimise the chance of having to answer to a retaliatory notice claim.
 
Overall helpfulness scale (Because let's be honest, Tribunal decisions can be a bit of a mess but still, landlords and tenants need all the help we can get!)

⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️


 


Recent Posts


Tags

Gluckman buying rules covid-19 tenancy issues Case study reserve bank speculator anti-social behaviour inspection election 2017 negotiation ird cash-flow rental wof buying principal and interest watercare income apia trust legal robert kiyosaki commerce commission brightline letting fee rent increase insurance smoke alarm housing package Landlording p lab development DTI ventilation Q&A HHGA Investor story rta productivity finance trademe rent arrears daikin retaliatory notice landlord buyer's agent HHS equity rta reform tenancy services interest limitation heating yield advice skill shortage recycling equity RBNZ management khh Guest blog financial advisers act shortland chartered accountants fixed-term tenancy sale and purchas wins Holler mortgage sale and purchase education privacy tenant building heater auckland council ocr beginner investor HSWA parry v inglis subdivision water bill short-term rental legal cost Tribunal case study property value Must know warm up new zealand shower dome investor RTAA 2019 sublease Jeff Bezos heat pump Must knows holiday house initio early termination Investment tip bad tenant government worksafe opes partners partners lvr How to mindset nzpif boarding house ring-fencing data security renovation Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance asbestos bond LIM anz tax off the plan market will clnz rent CoreLogic Editor's Choice relationship interest only scotney williams return Level 4 damage extractor fan meth contamination personal growth housing bubble Question and answer interest rates wealth creation travel bubble bankruptcy minor dwelling Sponsored post capital gain letting debt to income first home buying CCC cat structure barfoot and thompson tenancy tribunal airbnb unitary plan cgt inflation auckland Zodiak Management property property maintenance maintenance Market report debt enforcement Property (Relationships) Act investment strategy ask an expert interest deductibility property management meth gluckman report re agent positive cash flow business trespass kiwibuild banking house prices TCIT winz election2020 short term rental twg report bond form property apprentice Standards New Zealand housing affordability insulation property cycle rtaa2020 television warren buffett market rent quiet enjoyment rental market rent control termination

Archive

Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo